|
|
|
The new position will appear at the
beginning of each new month.
You are invited to solve it. I
will be pleased to
receive feedback
about the positions and the analysis. The solution will be published
the following month with the new position. Some of these positions
will come from actual historical games. Others will be composed
endgame studies, but they will be relevant to the practical game. The
site has over 400 chess endings and endgame studies and and has now reached its 10th year.

Russian Endgame Composer. International Judge of Compositions. A gifted composer who belonged to an elite group of early Soviet composers who showed many original ideas in the new emerging art of study composing. His best period of composing was before the Second World War. In 1961 he published Etyudi which consisted of 70 of his studies and also contained a long essay on the art of study composing with many examples.

Both of White's pieces are threatened: he is faced with losing one of them. Saving the Rook instead of the Bishop would lead to a lost BNPvR ending. Amazingly by saving the lesser valued Bishop White can set up an exceptional 'positional draw'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Basic Endings. These are theoretical positions in which we know the correct result with optimum play by both sides. They may consist of three pawns or less and also include all the non-pawn and five piece endings which have now been extensively analysed by computer and of which we have tablebases. In the days when we had adjournments some of these endings could be looked up in text books to give us some idea how to play the position. As we no longer can do this, knowledge and memory of these endings has become important in practical play. Fundamental Chess Endings (2001) by Muller and Lamprecht and Basic Endings (1992) by Balashov and Prandstetter and the earlier A Pocket Guide to Chess Endgames (1970) by David Hooper are good introductions to these endings.
(b) Practical Endings. These occur in over-the-board play where usually more pawns are present. The above ending is an example of this type. Some of these endings are in the process of being transformed to basic endings but often they finish before this stage is reached. Endgame strategy is very different from the middlegame and has its own set of rules and exceptions. Fine's book Basic Chess Endings (1941,2003) recently revised by Pal Benko and Batsford Chess Endings (1993) by Speelman, Tisdall and Wade are about basic and practical endings and both can be recommended.
(c) Endgame Studies. These are positions which have been composed and will contain elements of one or both of the above types of endings. But there are important differences between these types and the study, such as artistic form and economy of construction. An endgame study has to follow strict rules of composition, especially if it is entered into a composing competition. One of these rules states there should only be one solution. If there is an unintended second solution then the study is unsound and said to be "cooked".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|